The Case For Settling
February 18, 2008
My friend sent me this article “Marry Him!” today… While the single life has been discussed in jest in this venerable forum for issue facing both single men and single women. This article casts aside the jokes we all make about being on the mature side of single. Lori Gottleib says, “
Whether you acknowledge it or not, there’s good reason to worry. By the time 35th-birthday-brunch celebrations roll around for still-single women, serious, irreversible life issues masquerading as “jokes” creep into public conversation: Well, I don’t feel old, but my eggs sure do! or Maybe this year I’ll marry Todd. I’m not getting any younger! The birthday girl smiles a bit too widely as she delivers these lines, and everyone laughs a little too hard for a little too long, not because we find these sentiments funny, but because we’re awkwardly acknowledging how unfunny they are. At their core, they pose one of the most complicated, painful, and pervasive dilemmas many single women are forced to grapple with nowadays: Is it better to be alone, or to settle?
She goes on to say:
As I looked at him from across the table, I thought, Yeah, I’ll see him again. Maybe I can settle for that. But my very next thought was, Maybe I can settle for better. It’s like musical chairs—when do you take a seat, any seat, just so you’re not left standing alone?
Ms. Gottleib’s article’s thesis is trying to encourage younger single women to settle. Why YOUNGER single women, you ask?
Those of us who choose not to settle in hopes of finding a soul mate later are almost like teenagers who believe they’re invulnerable to dying in a drunk-driving accident. We lose sight of our mortality. We forget that we, too, will age and become less alluring. And even if some men do find us engaging, and they’re ready to have a family, they’ll likely decide to marry someone younger with whom they can have their own biological children. Which is all the more reason to settle before settling is no longer an option.
It is an interesting and depressing article written from a woman 10+ years my senior to women my age. And while depressing and a seemingly repugnant thought, I can’t help but see the logic. What do you all think? Not just limited to the single IRF readers… I thought this would get some good discussion going.
Entry Filed under: Children, LeMare's Posts, The Single Life. Tags: dating, marriage, settling.
7 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Jana | February 19, 2008 at 9:06 am
Personally, I don’t believe in soul mates. I think there are many people we could be happily married to. I don’t think it settling so much as realizing the “perfect” person may not exist.
On another note, JL and Mikel had their baby girl last night. Hooray! She’s a big girl — over 8 pounds.
2.
lowdogg | February 19, 2008 at 9:38 am
Congrats to JL & Mikel!
As for the post. I don’t think I’m qualified to say anything.
3.
Marcus | February 19, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Don’t settle, LeMare. Settling is for lawsuits, homesteading, gambling debts, and colonizing. Not for marriage.
4.
critts | February 19, 2008 at 11:26 pm
Here’s the thing – no one should settle. At the same time I think that as we get older our “standards” for what we’d marry get higher and higher but sometimes to a ridiculous standpoint. I just think one needs to be realistic when evaluating a prospective spouse. Are they perfect? Of course not, but no one is.
5.
Jdon | February 20, 2008 at 10:14 am
Hey, my wife settled for me! Please go easy on her!
6.
Sportsattitude | February 20, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Congrats indeed to JL and Mikel. As for settling, I would think there can be none allowed when it comes to such an important decision. Yet, Critts point is well made “standards and requirements” you’d like to see from a prospective partner probably can morph into unrealistic, unattainable, even impossible ones if you let them.
7.
Marcus | February 21, 2008 at 12:00 pm
I would “settle” for Ian at least responding (if not intelligently) to the comments under “Great comebacks to anti-Americanism,” but I notice he’s crawled back under his Canadian rock–which is abooot what I expected.